More Posts
Looking for more information on fixed income trends and market opportunities?
M&A Resurgence a Potential Risk to Investment Grade Fundamentals
- By David Del Vecchio, Managing Director and Co-Head of the U.S. Investment Grade Bond Team
- October 28, 2021
Our recent assessment of the M&A effects on the U.S. high yield market found that it tends to be a positive catalyst for performance. However, we see more nuanced effects—including the risk of negative rating migrations—across the investment grade corporate market. The following touches upon the momentum driving the M&A trend, the potential effects on investment-grade companies, and our resultant positioning within the sector.
Following a brief but sharp decline, 2021 M&A volumes have surpassed pre-pandemic levels as large corporations seek to gain scale and position themselves for continued growth in years to come. This surge in M&A activity has been boosted by record low interest rates, rising levels of CEO confidence, much-improved balance sheets, and elevated cash balances. That backdrop, combined with a strong rebound in earnings, will likely motivate investment grade corporate management teams to more aggressive uses of their cash balances, which currently offer anemic returns. Many will likely look to make acquisitions to accelerate or prolong their growth trajectory, or to better align their businesses to the post-pandemic environment. While BBB credits are likely to continue to prioritize debt repayment in an effort to preserve their investment-grade credit ratings, we believe higher-quality companies could be more willing to engage in M&A transactions that result in weaker credit fundamentals and ratings downgrades.
Moving Beyond the Pandemic
As the pandemic-related uncertainties eased, investment-grade credit fundamentals have largely returned to, and in some cases surpassed, pre-COVID levels. Revenue, EBITDA, profit margins, debt, and interest expense have improved. Meanwhile, after peaking in Q3 2020, cash and cash equivalents remain elevated, up approximately 20% relative to year-end 2019.¹
This increase in corporate cash balances and a strong rebound in earnings has motivated some corporate management teams to pursue more aggressive financial policies in recent months. For many, this has meant pursuing acquisitions to bolster growth and position themselves for a post-pandemic world. This, in turn, has helped fuel a spike in global M&A, with volume of $4.3 trillion through the first nine months of 2021 already overtaking the prior all-time annual peak of $4.1 trillion recorded in 2007.²
Meanwhile, financing conditions have rarely been this attractive. Equity valuations are high, with P/E multiples well above the five-year and 10-year average. Spreads are near the post-financial crisis tights and Treasury rates are near multi-decade lows. U.S. investment grade gross issuance totaled $1.1 trillion through the first nine months of 2021, well ahead of the average pace of $960 billion from 2016-2019. Yet, overall issuance activity isn’t proportional across ratings categories. A-rated issuers have been among the most active, accounting for 47% of year-to-date total issuance despite accounting for only 29% of the U.S. non-financial universe by market value.3,4 Conversely, BBB-rated issuers have accounted for 44% of issuance so far in 2021 despite accounting for 62% of the investment grade universe (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1: A-Rated Issuance Accounted for 47% of New Issuance in 2021
At $111 billion, the M&A-related IG debt issuance has been relatively muted thus far in 2021, and the $71 billion of announced but pending M&A-related issuance is moderate. However, going forward we believe some companies are more likely than others to pursue aggressive financials polices including M&A transactions, share buybacks, and dividends at the expense of their balance sheets.
From Single-A to Triple-B
While the pace of downgrades within IG has slowed considerably in recent quarters, pockets of credit deterioration are evident. In the first three quarters of 2021, approximately $91 billion worth of single-A rated bonds were downgraded to BBB, much of which can be attributed to increased debt issuance for M&A or shareholder returns (Figure 2).5
FIGURE 2: Downgrades from A to BBB Jumped in 2021
Among the recent downgrades is Southwest Gas Corp. and AmeriSource Bergen, which both saw their credit ratings lowered as a result of acquisitions. In the case of Southwest Gas Corp., the company’s A- rating was lowered to BBB after completing its acquisition of Riggs Distiller & Co. in August. AmerisourceBergen’s long-term issuer rating was lowered from A- to BBB+ in June after completing its $6.5 billion acquisition of Alliance Healthcare.
Meanwhile, Baxter International’s long-term A- credit rating is currently in jeopardy, with Standard & Poor’s placing it on CreditWatch with negative implications after the medical device company said it would acquire Hill-Rom Holdings for $12.7 billion. S&P said it expects the incremental debt to increase Baxter’s adjusted leverage to about 4.1x from 1.0x-2.0x.
The Low Cost of Being Downgraded
Notably, management teams continue to appear more willing to be downgraded from A to BBB than they are to be downgraded from investment grade to high yield. While overall downgrades from investment grade to high yield have remained muted in 2021 (at only $7 billion through the third quarter of the year), downgrades of non-financial IG totaled $292 billion through the same period. More than one-third of those debt downgrades were from A to BBB. For added perspective, about 6% of all non-financial IG debt was downgraded through the first three quarters of this year, with the large majority remaining investment grade.5
FIGURE 3: Spread Differential Between BBBs and As at an 11-Year Low
Underlying this pattern is that the relative cost of getting downgraded from A to BBB is quite low while the cost of getting downgraded to below investment grade is comparably high. The spread differential between A-rated and BBB-rated corporates has declined substantially over the past few years, decreasing the benefit of a single-A rating from a funding perspective. At 37 bps, the BBB-A spread differential is now at the narrowest since 2010 (Figure 3). As a result, the cost of higher leverage and lower ratings is quite low. Meanwhile, the spread differential between BBB-rated and BB-rated corporates is approximately 93 bps, reinforcing the value of maintaining a high-grade rating. Other benefits to remaining investment grade include maintaining access to the debt markets and the possibility that the Fed could once again purchase investment grade corporate bonds in a severe recession or market downturn.
So, while we remain cautiously optimistic on investment grade corporate spreads overall, we expect some management teams to shift their focus away from deleveraging toward more aggressive uses of capital. BBB credits are still expected to prioritize debt repayment to maintain or improve their investment grade ratings—indeed, about 60% of the credit rating upgrades in Q3 were BBB-rated issuers moving up to A ratings.5 Yet, the risk of M&A leading to a deterioration of fundamentals and negative credit migration among A-rated companies could become more prevalent as earnings growth begins to slow. It is a dynamic that underscores the importance of understanding management teams’ motivations and sensitivity to borrowing costs, their willingness to add leverage to the balance sheet, and their commitment to their ratings—or lack thereof.
This material reflects the views of the author as of October 28, 2021 and is provided for informational or educational purposes only. Source(s) of data (unless otherwise noted): PGIM Fixed Income.
1 J.P. Morgan HG Credit Fundamentals: 2Q Review, September 15, 2021.
2 Reuters, “Pandemic recovery fuels deal crease as third-quarter M&A breaks all records,” September 30, 2021.
3 JP Morgan US High Grade Corporate Bond Issuance Review, October 5, 2021.
4 JP Morgan US HG Credit Ratings Review, July 16, 2021.
5 J.P. Morgan, US HG 3Q21 Credit Rating Review, October 11, 2021.
David Del Vecchio
David Del Vecchio is a Managing Director and Co-Head of U.S. Investment Grade Corporate Bond Team at PGIM Fixed Income. Mr. Del Vecchio is responsible for day-to-day decisions for the U.S. Investment Grade Corporate bond portfolios and U.S. corporate relative value decisions. Mr. Del Vecchio is focused on intermediate and short corporate strategies as well as corporate security selection in multi-sector strategies. Previously, he was a U.S. Investment Grade Corporate portfolio manager at the Firm. Prior to that, Mr. Del Vecchio was a taxable money markets portfolio manager for the Money Markets Group, responsible for managing proprietary fixed income accounts, as well as the securities lending portfolios. Prior to joining the Money Markets Group in 2000, he was responsible for the lending/repurchase agreements of U.S. government, agency, and STRIP securities in the Firm’s Securities Lending Group. Mr. Del Vecchio joined the Firm in 1995. He received a BS in Business Administration with a specialization in Finance from The College of New Jersey, and an MBA in Finance from New York University.
PGIM Fixed Income operates primarily through PGIM, Inc., a registered investment adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and a Prudential Financial, Inc. (“PFI”) company. Registration as a registered investment adviser does not imply a certain level or skill or training. PGIM Fixed Income is headquartered in Newark, New Jersey and also includes the following businesses globally: (i) the public fixed income unit within PGIM Limited, located in London; (ii) PGIM Netherlands B.V. located in Amsterdam; (iii) PGIM Japan Co., Ltd. (“PGIM Japan”), located in Tokyo; (iv) the public fixed income unit within PGIM (Hong Kong) Ltd. located in Hong Kong; and (v) the public fixed income unit within PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., located in Singapore (“PGIM Singapore”). PFI of the United States is not affiliated in any manner with Prudential plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom or with Prudential Assurance Company, a subsidiary of M&G plc, incorporated in the United Kingdom. Prudential, PGIM, their respective logos, and the Rock symbol are service marks of PFI and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.
These materials are for informational or educational purposes only. The information is not intended as investment advice and is not a recommendation about managing or investing assets. In providing these materials, PGIM is not acting as your fiduciary. These materials represent the views, opinions and recommendations of the author(s) regarding the economic conditions, asset classes, securities, issuers or financial instruments referenced herein. Distribution of this information to any person other than the person to whom it was originally delivered and to such person’s advisers is unauthorized, and any reproduction of these materials, in whole or in part, or the divulgence of any of the contents hereof, without prior consent of PGIM Fixed Income is prohibited. Certain information contained herein has been obtained from sources that PGIM Fixed Income believes to be reliable as of the date presented; however, PGIM Fixed Income cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information, assure its completeness, or warrant such information will not be changed. The information contained herein is current as of the date of issuance (or such earlier date as referenced herein) and is subject to change without notice. PGIM Fixed Income has no obligation to update any or all of such information; nor do we make any express or implied warranties or representations as to the completeness or accuracy or accept responsibility for errors. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of capital. These materials are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument or an y investment management services and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. No risk management technique can guarantee the mitigation or elimination of risk in any market environment. Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results and an investment could lose value. No liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss (whether direct, indirect, or consequential) that may arise from any use of the information contained in or derived from this report. PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views expressed herein, including for proprietary accounts of PGIM Fixed Income or its affiliates.
The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients or prospects. No determination has been made regarding the suitability of any securities, financial instruments or strategies for particular clients or prospects. For any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein, the recipient(s) of this report must make its own independent decisions.
Conflicts of Interest: PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates may have investment advisory or other business relationships with the issuers of securities referenced herein. PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates, officers, directors and employees may from time to time have long or short positions in and buy or sell securities or financial instruments referenced herein. PGIM Fixed Income and its affiliates may develop and publish research that is independent of, and different than, the recommendations contained herein. PGIM Fixed Income’s personnel other than the author(s), such as sales, marketing and trading personnel, may provide oral or written market commentary or ideas to PGIM Fixed Income’s clients or prospects or proprietary investment ideas that differ from the views expressed herein. Additional information regarding actual and potential conflicts of interest is available in Part 2A of PGIM Fixed Income’s Form ADV.
In the United Kingdom, information is issued by PGIM Limited with registered office: Grand Buildings, 1-3 Strand, Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5HR. PGIM Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) of the United Kingdom (Firm Reference Number 193418). In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), information is issued by PGIM Netherlands B.V., an entity authorised by the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (“AFM”) in the Netherlands and operating on the basis of a European passport. In certain EEA countries, information is, where permitted, presented by PGIM Limited in reliance of provisions, exemptions or licenses available to PGIM Limited under temporary permission arrangements following the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union. These materials are issued by PGIM Limited and/or PGIM Netherlands B.V. to persons who are professional clients as defined under the rules of the FCA and/or to persons who are professional clients as defined in the relevant local implementation of Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). In certain countries in Asia-Pacific, information is presented by PGIM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., a Singapore investment manager registered with and licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. In Japan, information is presented by PGIM Japan Co. Ltd., registered investment adviser with the Japanese Financial Services Agency. In South Korea, information is presented by PGIM, Inc., which is licensed to provide discretionary investment management services directly to South Korean investors. In Hong Kong, information is provided by PGIM (Hong Kong) Limited, a regulated entity with the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong to professional investors as defined in Section 1 of Part 1 of Schedule 1 (paragraph (a) to (i) of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571). In Australia, this information is presented by PGIM (Australia) Pty Ltd (“PGIM Australia”) for the general information of its “wholesale” customers (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001). PGIM Australia is a representative of PGIM Limited, which is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services License under the Australian Corporations Act 2001 in respect of financial services. PGIM Limited is exempt by virtue of its regulation by the FCA (Reg: 193418) under the laws of the United Kingdom and the application of ASIC Class Order 03/1099. The laws of the United Kingdom differ from Australian laws. In South Africa, PGIM, Inc. is an authorised financial services provider – FSP number 49012. In Canada, pursuant to the international adviser registration exemption in National Instrument 31-103, PGIM, Inc. is informing you of that: (1) PGIM, Inc. is not registered in Canada and is advising you in reliance upon an exemption from the adviser registration requirement under National Instrument 31-103; (2) PGIM, Inc.’s jurisdiction of residence is New Jersey, U.S.A.; (3) there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against PGIM, Inc. because it is resident outside of Canada and all or substantially all of its assets may be situated outside of Canada; and (4) the name and address of the agent for service of process of PGIM, Inc. in the applicable Provinces of Canada are as follows: in Québec: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 1000 de La Gauchetière Street West, Suite 900 Montréal, QC H3B 5H4; in British Columbia: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 1200 Waterfront Centre, 200 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V7X 1T2; in Ontario: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3400, Toronto, ON M5H 4E3; in Nova Scotia: Cox & Palmer, Q.C., 1100 Purdy’s Wharf Tower One, 1959 Upper Water Street, P.O. Box 2380 – Stn Central RPO, Halifax, NS B3J 3E5; in Alberta: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, 530 Third Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P R3.
© 2021 PFI and its related entities.
